III. Build the Future

The Pillars

"Pillars" is this platform's name for the twelve sectors and initiatives covered in this step — where the UK has a genuine opportunity to build lasting capacity, jobs, and exports, once the fourteen Foundations in Fix the Present are in place.

Live policy already funded or under way Proposed this platform's recommendation Cautionary tale tried before, worth learning from Contested genuine debate, included anyway
Group 1

Energy & Industry

Cheap domestic power, and the manufacturing capacity it makes possible — five pillars that largely depend on each other.

Energy Sovereignty

Cheap, secure, domestically generated energy is the enabling input for most of the pillars that follow. Three sources, pursued in parallel:

ProposedNorth Sea oil and gas

Continued licensing on the basis that UK consumption does not fall when domestic extraction stops — it is replaced by imported gas, often at a higher carbon cost to ship. Best understood as a fiscal and energy-security argument rather than a climate-neutral one.

ProposedSevern Estuary & Bristol Channel tidal power

An estimated 8-13GW of extractable tidal capacity, potentially up to 20% of UK electricity needs. A phased approach using tidal lagoons rather than a single barrage reduces the environmental and cost profile, and the output can run subsidised industrial energy tariffs that anchor the reindustrialisation pillar below.

ProposedFloating solar on Scottish lochs

An underused resource held back mainly by cost. One parliamentary estimate put the potential at 16GW of added capacity if expanded nationally.

ProposedStrategic reserves and emergency energy support

A shorter-term complement to the three structural sources above. As set out in Understand the Past, geopolitical energy shocks repeatedly expose how directly UK growth and inflation move with global energy prices — and the UK holds far less strategic petroleum and gas reserve than the IEA recommends, leaving it more exposed than it needs to be. Building buffer stocks during lower-price periods, alongside a standing emergency business energy support mechanism that auto-triggers when wholesale prices cross a defined threshold rather than requiring fresh emergency legislation each time, would reduce the economy's exposure to the next shock rather than only responding after it lands.

Image placeholder
Aerial or concept image of the Severn Estuary/Bristol Channel, or a tidal lagoon rendering — the pillar's headline energy source.
Coal is deliberately excluded. Point-of-use carbon capture on coal combustion has been tried twice before as the basis of UK CCS policy, in 2011 and 2016, and both attempts were cancelled before reaching commercial deployment; coal-CCS has never been demonstrated at commercial power-plant scale anywhere in the world. Reviving coal would reverse the UK's position as the first G7 nation to fully phase out coal power.

Strategic Reindustrialisation

Target sectors selected against one test: a large UK market, minimal current domestic capacity, a realistic timeframe to build it, and a genuine export opportunity.

ProposedGeneric drug APIs

Only around 25% of API production for generic medicines happens in Europe at all. A shared UK-EU gap, though the EU's own Critical Medicines Act means the window is time-limited.

ProposedInsulin and biologics

Near-zero UK manufacturing capacity despite a stable, non-cyclical market worth roughly £500m. An existing operator (Wockhardt) provides a foothold. Full detail in Supporting Detail below.

ProposedAntibiotics

Global production is dangerously concentrated, largely in China.

ContestedElectronics (phones and tablets)

A forward-dated, statutorily fixed import tariff as a long-term demand-rebalancing tool. Chip fabrication is unlikely to relocate to the UK, but assembly and mid-tier components are plausible. Included deliberately as the hardest, most debatable case in this list. Mechanism detailed in Supporting Detail below.

Live — July 2026Steel

No longer a proposal but a live case study: on 16 July 2026 the UK nationalised British Steel days before the UK would have become the only G7 nation unable to manufacture its own primary steel. Electric arc furnace steelmaking requires cheap, reliable electricity — steel is a direct test of the Energy Sovereignty pillar above.

Image placeholder
British Steel's Scunthorpe blast furnaces — the site nationalised in July 2026.

ProposedFertiliser and ammonia

The UK produces only around 40% of its nitrogen fertiliser requirement. Domestic ammonia production has effectively collapsed for the same energy-cost reason as steel.

ProposedHeat pumps

Government net-zero heating policy already creates guaranteed demand, so a tariff on imported units only needs to redirect an already-guaranteed market. Mechanism detailed in Supporting Detail below.

High riskBatteries and EV cells

A genuine long-term opportunity, but high-risk — the collapse of Britishvolt is the standard cautionary example. Needs sovereign-fund patient capital, not a tariff alone.

Live policyWind turbine components

The UK imports most offshore wind hardware despite enormous demand. The Great British Energy Supply Chain Fund is already awarding up to £300 million in capital grants, and relevant import tariffs were removed in April 2026.

Robotics and Automation

Image placeholder
A UK factory floor with robotic arms/automated production line — ideally SME-scale, to match the text's SME-adoption-gap point.

A productivity gap rather than a capacity gap, sitting underneath every other pillar. UK robot density stands at roughly 104 per 10,000 manufacturing workers against a global average of 177 — the lowest in the G7, lower than Mexico and Turkey. Around 20,000 of the UK's 27,000 manufacturing SMEs operate without a single robot installed; closing the gap could add up to £150 billion to UK GDP by 2035. The barriers manufacturers cite are not primarily cost: fragmented government support and a shortage of digital integration skills matter more.

Critical Minerals

Image placeholder
Cornish Lithium or British Lithium extraction site near St Austell, Cornwall.

Cautionary taleCornwall lithium

Cornwall holds one of Europe's largest lithium deposits, but in February 2026 Imerys mothballed its flagship British Lithium project after a global price crash made it commercially unviable. The lesson: leaving strategically important extraction purely to private capital means it lives and dies on short-term commodity swings.

ProposedCritical mineral recycling ("urban mining")

For minerals the UK has no domestic ore for, recovery from e-waste, retired turbine magnets, and spent EV batteries is a chemistry and manufacturing challenge — genuinely buildable domestically.

Carbon Capture: Selling the Science, Not Just the Target

Image placeholder
The Padeswood cement plant (Heidelberg Materials) or Protos energy-recovery facility — the UK's first carbon-capture-enabled cement and waste-to-energy sites.

Mixed record The UK has attempted to launch CCUS twice before, in 2011 and 2016, and both attempts were cancelled; in December 2024 the government concluded its 2030 capture target was not achievable, and 27 projects have been cancelled or paused since 2023. Set against that, real substance exists: five major projects have reached financial close and entered construction, and government has committed roughly £21.7 billion over 25 years.

Two things make this exportable rather than a compliance cost: UK company Carbon Clean manufactures its CycloneCC technology entirely in the North of England and projects £83 million in export contributions over five years, and the UK Continental Shelf holds an estimated 78 billion tonnes of CO2 storage capacity — roughly 25% of Europe's total — opening a storage-as-a-service opportunity.

Group 2

Knowledge & Digital

Turning UK research, compute, and creative output into jobs and exports rather than letting other countries capture the value.

Research Into Jobs and Exports

The UK's underlying weakness is not research output, it is commercialisation. DeepMind, ARM, and the licensing of Oxford's vaccine research are the standard examples of world-class UK science primarily benefiting other countries' industrial bases. Public R&D funding should carry conditions that keep resulting IP UK-anchored, paired with a dedicated export and licensing function. Small modular nuclear reactors follow the same logic: build the first domestic fleet, then export the design and hardware, the way South Korea converted its domestic nuclear programme into an export business.

A simpler R&D tax credit regime is the practical enabler underneath this: the current scheme has been through repeated rule changes and rate structures in recent years, and complexity itself has become a barrier — smaller firms in particular under-claim relative to what they're entitled to simply because the system is hard to navigate without specialist advice. Simplification is a low-cost, high-value companion to every other proposal in this pillar.

Sovereign Compute and AI Infrastructure

Image placeholder
A data centre interior or exterior, ideally one of the UK's new AI Growth Zone sites (e.g. North East, North Wales, Scotland).

Live policy The UK has designated five AI Growth Zones, which have collectively secured at least $38.5 billion in private investment commitments, with the programme forecast to unlock up to £100 billion overall. The sector's own analysts identify power availability, not planning or capital, as the binding constraint on delivery speed — meaning the Severn tidal, Scottish floating solar, and grid-connection-reform foundations are the precondition for this pillar, not a separate agenda.

A second, distinct problem sits behind the infrastructure question: government departments have already commissioned and written a substantial body of research and policy thinking on AI, but very little of it has been actively shared with business in a usable form, and almost no direct resource has been provided to help ordinary companies — particularly smaller ones without an in-house data science function — actually adopt the technology. This is a genuine leapfrog opportunity sitting largely unused: a well-resourced, actively distributed programme of practical AI-adoption support for business, drawing on work government has already funded, could move UK competitiveness against peer economies quickly and relatively cheaply compared with the capital-intensive pillars elsewhere in this document. Realising it depends on the labour market flexibility described in Foundation 13 — businesses will only adopt AI at pace if they can also responsibly adjust their workforce as roles change, paired with meaningful retraining support for people whose roles are displaced, rather than either blocking adoption through rigid employment rules or leaving displaced workers with no path to a different role.

Creative and Digital Industries

Image placeholder
A rendering of the Universal Studios UK resort under construction in Bedford, or a UK video game studio at work.

Already succeeding The one pillar already succeeding at world scale, so the recommendation is to extend a proven model rather than build from nothing. The UK is the fourth largest video game exporter in the world, with exports at 87.5% of the industry's total revenue and roughly £12bn in annual economic contribution. The existing 34% tax credit for video game production should extend to AI-generated video and animation. Tourism is a related, already-moving opportunity: the Universal Studios UK resort under construction in Bedford is projected to draw 8.5-12 million visitors annually.

Space: A Sector of Two Halves

Live & thrivingSatellite manufacturing and services

£18.6bn in income, £7.2bn direct GDP contribution, over 55,000 jobs, first in Europe for private space investment.

Image placeholder
A satellite cleanroom, e.g. Surrey Satellite Technology or Goonhilly Earth Station in Cornwall.
Image placeholder
SaxaVord Spaceport, Shetland, or the Virgin Orbit Cornwall launch attempt — the two launch cautionary tales referenced in the text.

Cautionary taleLaunch capability

Virgin Orbit's 2023 Cornwall launch failed and the company went bankrupt; SaxaVord Spaceport in Shetland has slipped from a 2023 target to the second half of 2026, following an engine explosion in testing and a loan default. The platform's position: back the genuine strength without treating launch as a flagship.

Group 3

Land, Trade & Detail

Food security, capacity the UK already has but under-exports, and the supporting detail behind two of the harder claims elsewhere in this step.

Food Security

Image placeholder
Interior of a vertical farm or high-tech glasshouse (rows of leafy produce under LED lighting).

ProposedVertical farming and glasshouses

UK food self-sufficiency fell from 65% to 60% by value in the most recent year alone, with 85% of fresh fruit and roughly half of vegetables imported. Energy-intensive enough to connect directly to the subsidised power in the Energy Sovereignty pillar.

Live, unrealisedPrecision breeding

The Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act, in force since November 2025, makes the UK the first major European economy to fully implement a science-based framework for gene-edited crops — a genuine advantage, but one that remains commercially unrealised until products reach shelves in late 2026.

ProposedAgricultural inheritance tax exemption

Since the 2024 Budget, IHT relief on agricultural property has been capped; the government partially reversed course in December 2025, raising the full-relief threshold to £2.5 million. This platform's position is that genuinely farmed land — as distinct from land held as an IHT shelter — should be fully exempt, not merely subject to a higher threshold.

Capacity Already Held But Not Exported

Distinct from reindustrialisation — sectors where UK capacity already exists and the constraint is market access or institutional culture, not capability.

Capacity existsDefence manufacturing

Proven capability through BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, and shipbuilding, but the government's own 2025 Defence Industrial Strategy acknowledges exporting has historically been treated as "an optional extra." A new Office of Defence Exports is intended to address this.

Capacity existsAgri-food

UK dairy production is substantial, but a new UK-GCC trade deal is only now removing tariffs on items like cheddar and butter that had priced UK production out of a major market.

Supporting Detail

Backing detail for two of this platform's harder-to-verify claims, kept separate so the pillar entries above could stay concise.

Insulin & biologics — the fuller case

There is an open Parliament petition calling for investment in UK insulin production to "ensure self-sufficiency," noting that since Brexit the UK cannot rely on being the first priority should there be a shortage from its mainly European suppliers. The UK insulin drugs and delivery devices market is valued at roughly £509m (2025), projected to reach ~£560m by 2030 — a stable, non-cyclical market compared with something like batteries or lithium, which are exposed to commodity price swings. Wockhardt already operates insulin manufacturing in both the UK and India, giving an existing regulatory pathway to expand from. The underlying reason insulin is a stronger near-term target than electronics: biologics are a regulatory and bioprocess challenge (GMP compliance, MHRA approval), not a semiconductor-scale capital challenge — a modern biologics facility is a multi-year, tens-of-millions investment, against a decade-plus, tens-of-billions investment for a leading-edge chip fab.

The phone-tariff mechanism, applied to heat pumps

A forward-dated import tariff — announced now, taking effect only after a multi-year lead time — functions as an investment signal rather than an overnight price shock, giving manufacturers time to build the capacity the tariff is meant to protect. Best understood as a standing, long-term policy tool rather than a single event: a schedule of tariffs set years in advance and locked in statutorily, shifting the balance of UK consumption toward domestic supply over a full economic cycle — the same logic Vietnam and South Korea used to build manufacturing ecosystems gradually. Heat pumps are the cleaner test case of the two, because government net-zero heating policy already creates guaranteed demand — the tariff only needs to redirect an already-guaranteed market toward domestic manufacturers, rather than create a market from nothing the way the phones case requires.

This is the last of the three parts. This platform makes no claim to a single decisive fix — UK economic resilience depends on several parallel tracks reinforcing each other: the diagnosis in Understand the Past, the preconditions in Fix the Present, and the sectors above. Progress depends equally on abandoning specific current directions — high street protectionism, undelivered civil service reform, fragmented technology governance — and on redirecting existing efforts, such as trade policy, from signing agreements toward ensuring businesses actually use them.
A final, honest note. This platform does not claim to have identified every issue that matters to the UK's future, nor to have resolved the ones it has raised — several of the newest additions here (Heathrow, SEND reform, PIP, WASPI) are genuinely contested, and adult social care is named on the home page as a problem this platform knows it hasn't tackled yet, deliberately. This document has tried to say so plainly rather than force a false consensus or a false completeness. What it has tried to do is set out enough of the real evidence, honestly weighed, to move a conversation forward rather than end it. If something important is missing — and it likely still is — that is a reason to keep building this platform, not a flaw in the attempt. Hopefully this is more than a start.